FPSVersusCore i5-10600K vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Performance score
Core i5-10600K and Ryzen 7 2700X are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
Different sockets (LGA1200 and AM4) — switching between them needs a different motherboard.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core i5-10600K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 28.37 | 27.96 |
| Ranking position | 328 | 340 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | 11.86 | 13.92 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Comet Lake | Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge) |
| Release date | Q2 2020 | 2018-04-19 |
Specifications
| Core i5-10600K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock | 4.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB |
| Process node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Unlocked multiplier | yes | yes |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | no |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Compatibility
| Core i5-10600K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| TDP | 125 W | 105 W |
Memory and PCI Express
| Core i5-10600K | Ryzen 7 2700X | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max memory | 128 GB | no data |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros and cons
Core i5-10600K
- 21% faster single core
- newer: released in 2020
- has integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630)
Ryzen 7 2700X
- more cores: 8 vs 6
- more threads: 16 vs 12
- bigger L3 cache: 16 MB vs 12 MB
- lower TDP: 105 W vs 125 W
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core i5-10600K / Ryzen 7 2700X.
No comments yet — be the first.