FPSVersusCore i3-6300 vs FX-8300
Performance score
By our estimate, Core i3-6300 beats FX-8300 by 6%.
Different sockets (LGA1151 and AM3+) — switching between them needs a different motherboard.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
CPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core i3-6300 | FX-8300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 14.02 | 13.23 |
| Ranking position | 483 | 489 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | 14.37 | 7.28 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Skylake | Piledriver (Vishera) |
| Release date | Q3 2015 | 2012-10-23 |
Specifications
| Core i3-6300 | FX-8300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
| Process node | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | yes |
| Integrated graphics | Intel HD Graphics 530 | no |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Compatibility
| Core i3-6300 | FX-8300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM3+ |
| TDP | 51 W | 95 W |
Memory and PCI Express
| Core i3-6300 | FX-8300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR4-1866/2133 | DDR3-1866 |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max memory | 64 GB | no data |
| PCI Express version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCIe lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros and cons
Core i3-6300
- 6% higher overall score
- 68% faster single core
- lower TDP: 51 W vs 95 W
- newer: released in 2015
- has integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530)
FX-8300
- more cores: 8 vs 2
- more threads: 8 vs 4
- bigger L3 cache: 8 MB vs 4 MB
- unlocked multiplier (can be overclocked)
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core i3-6300 / FX-8300.
No comments yet — be the first.