FPSVersusCore Ultra 9 386H vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
Performance score
By our estimate, Core Ultra 9 386H beats Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 by 3%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core Ultra 9 386H | Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 50.41 | 49.01 |
| Ranking position | 65 | 71 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Panther Lake | Zen 5 (Gorgon Point) |
| Release date | Q1 2026 | Q1 2026 |
Specifications
| Core Ultra 9 386H | Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 16 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| P + E cores | 4 + 12 | no data |
| Base clock | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 18 MB | 24 MB |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Graphics | no |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Pros and cons
Core Ultra 9 386H
- more cores: 16 vs 12
- has integrated graphics (Intel Graphics)
Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
- more threads: 24 vs 16
- bigger L3 cache: 24 MB vs 18 MB
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core Ultra 9 386H / Ryzen AI 9 HX 470.
No comments yet — be the first.