EN

Core Ultra 7 366H vs Core Ultra 9 386H

VS

Performance score

Core Ultra 7 366H 2026 · 16/16 cores/threads
49.38
Core Ultra 9 386H 2026 · 16/16 cores/threads
50.41

Core Ultra 7 366H and Core Ultra 9 386H are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

CPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 78% of tested · runs: 4

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Core Ultra 7 366HCore Ultra 9 386H
Score (0–100) 49.38 50.41
Ranking position 67 65
Type Laptop Laptop
Manufacturer Intel Intel
Architecture Panther Lake Panther Lake
Release date Q1 2026 Q1 2026

Specifications

Core Ultra 7 366HCore Ultra 9 386H
Cores 16 16
Threads 16 16
P + E cores 4 + 12 4 + 12
Boost clock 4.8 GHz 4.9 GHz
L3 cache 18 MB 18 MB
Unlocked multiplier no no
Integrated graphics Intel Graphics Intel Graphics
NPU (AI accelerator) no no

Pros and cons

Core Ultra 7 366H

  • no notable advantages

Core Ultra 9 386H

  • no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core Ultra 7 366H:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core Ultra 9 386H:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core Ultra 7 366H / Core Ultra 9 386H.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.