FPSVersusCore Ultra 7 265K vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Performance score
By our estimate, Core Ultra 7 265K beats Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 12%.
Different sockets (LGA1851 and FP11) — switching between them needs a different motherboard.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 79.26 | 70.63 |
| Ranking position | 10 | 19 |
| Price/performance (0–100) | 72.19 | no data |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | 33.14 | 67.11 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake | Zen 5 (Strix Halo) |
| Release date | 2024-10-24 | 2025-02-25 |
| Launch price | $394 | no data |
Specifications
| Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 20 | 16 |
| Threads | 20 | 32 |
| P + E cores | 8 + 12 | no data |
| Base clock | 3.9 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L2 cache | 36 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 64 MB |
| Process node | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Unlocked multiplier | yes | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Graphics | AMD Radeon 8060S |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | 50 TOPS |
Compatibility
| Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | FP11 |
| TDP | 125 W | 55 W |
| Max temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Memory and PCI Express
| Core Ultra 7 265K | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X (256-bit) |
| Memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Max memory | 256 GB | no data |
| PCI Express version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe lanes | 24 | no data |
Pros and cons
Core Ultra 7 265K
- 12% higher overall score
- more cores: 20 vs 16
- unlocked multiplier (can be overclocked)
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
- more threads: 32 vs 20
- bigger L3 cache: 64 MB vs 30 MB
- lower TDP: 55 W vs 125 W
- newer: released in 2025
Other comparisons
- Core Ultra 7265K vs Core i913900K
- Core Ultra 7265K vs Snapdragon X2 Elite ExtremeX2E-96-100
- Core Ultra 7265K vs Ryzen 99900X
- Core Ultra 7265K vs Snapdragon X2 Elite ExtremeX2E-94-100
- Ryzen AI Max+395 vs Ryzen 99955HX
- Ryzen AI Max+395 vs Ryzen 99955HX3D
- Ryzen AI Max+395 vs Snapdragon X2 EliteX2E-90-100
- Ryzen AI Max+395 vs Core i714700K
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core Ultra 7 265K / Ryzen AI Max+ 395.
No comments yet — be the first.