EN

Core Ultra 5 235H vs Core Ultra 5 235HX

VS

Performance score

Core Ultra 5 235H 2025 · 14/14 cores/threads
46.14
Core Ultra 5 235HX 2025 · 14/14 cores/threads
47.43 +3%

By our estimate, Core Ultra 5 235HX beats Core Ultra 5 235H by 3%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

CPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 64% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Core Ultra 5 235HCore Ultra 5 235HX
Score (0–100) 46.14 47.43
Ranking position 92 88
Type Laptop Laptop
Manufacturer Intel Intel
Architecture Arrow Lake Arrow Lake
Release date Q2 2025 Q1 2025

Specifications

Core Ultra 5 235HCore Ultra 5 235HX
Cores 14 14
Threads 14 14
P + E cores 4 + 10 6 + 8
Base clock no data 2.9 GHz
Boost clock 5 GHz 5.1 GHz
L3 cache 18 MB 24 MB
Unlocked multiplier no no
Integrated graphics Intel Arc 140T GPU Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)
NPU (AI accelerator) no no

Pros and cons

Core Ultra 5 235H

  • no notable advantages

Core Ultra 5 235HX

  • bigger L3 cache: 24 MB vs 18 MB

Other comparisons

Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core Ultra 5 235H:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core Ultra 5 235HX:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core Ultra 5 235H / Core Ultra 5 235HX.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.