FPSVersusCore Ultra 5 235HX vs Ryzen AI Max 385
Performance score
Core Ultra 5 235HX and Ryzen AI Max 385 are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
CPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core Ultra 5 235HX | Ryzen AI Max 385 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 47.43 | 47 |
| Ranking position | 88 | 89 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake | Zen 5 (Strix Halo) |
| Release date | Q1 2025 | Q1 2025 |
Specifications
| Core Ultra 5 235HX | Ryzen AI Max 385 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 14 | 8 |
| Threads | 14 | 16 |
| P + E cores | 6 + 8 | no data |
| Base clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.1 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 32 MB |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | Radeon 8050S |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Pros and cons
Core Ultra 5 235HX
- more cores: 14 vs 8
Ryzen AI Max 385
- 6% faster single core
- more threads: 16 vs 14
- bigger L3 cache: 32 MB vs 24 MB
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core Ultra 5 235HX / Ryzen AI Max 385.
No comments yet — be the first.