EN

Core 7 250H vs Core Ultra 7 265U

VS

Performance score

Core 7 250H 2025 · 14/20 cores/threads
45.58
Core Ultra 7 265U 2025 · 12/14 cores/threads
45.33

Core 7 250H and Core Ultra 7 265U are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

CPU rendering (Blender)

Core 7 250H
209+83 %

faster than 70% of tested · runs: 2

faster than 32% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Core 7 250HCore Ultra 7 265U
Score (0–100) 45.58 45.33
Ranking position 96 97
Type Laptop Laptop
Manufacturer Intel Intel
Architecture Raptor Lake Arrow Lake
Release date Q1 2025 Q2 2025

Specifications

Core 7 250HCore Ultra 7 265U
Cores 14 12
Threads 20 14
P + E cores 6 + 8 2 + 10
Base clock 2.5 GHz no data
Boost clock 5.4 GHz 5.3 GHz
L3 cache 24 MB 12 MB
Unlocked multiplier no no
Integrated graphics Intel Graphics Intel Graphics
NPU (AI accelerator) no no

Pros and cons

Core 7 250H

  • more cores: 14 vs 12
  • more threads: 20 vs 14
  • bigger L3 cache: 24 MB vs 12 MB

Core Ultra 7 265U

  • 5% faster single core

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core 7 250H:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core Ultra 7 265U:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core 7 250H / Core Ultra 7 265U.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.