FPSVersusCeleron N5100 vs Core i3-3225
Performance score
Core i5-12450H
Core Ultra 7 258V
Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Core i9-14900HX
Core i9-14900K
Ryzen 9 9950X
By our estimate, Core i3-3225 beats Celeron N5100 by 44%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Overview
| Celeron N5100 | Core i3-3225 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 7.03 | 10.15 |
| Ranking position | 526 | 518 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | no data | 9.64 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Tremont (Jasper Lake) | Ivy Bridge |
| Release date | Q1 2022 | Q3 2012 |
Specifications
| Celeron N5100 | Core i3-3225 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB |
| Process node | no data | 22 nm |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Compatibility
| Celeron N5100 | Core i3-3225 | |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | no data | LGA1155 |
| TDP | no data | 55 W |
Memory and PCI Express
| Celeron N5100 | Core i3-3225 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | no data | DDR3-1333/1600 |
| Memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Max memory | no data | 32 GB |
| PCI Express version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros and cons
Celeron N5100
- more cores: 4 vs 2
- bigger L3 cache: 4 MB vs 3 MB
- newer: released in 2022
Core i3-3225
- 44% higher overall score
- 39% faster single core
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Celeron N5100 / Core i3-3225.
No comments yet — be the first.