FPSVersusApple A16 Bionic vs Dimensity 9200
Performance score
By our estimate, Apple A16 Bionic beats Dimensity 9200 by 33%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Apple A16 Bionic | Dimensity 9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 24.95 | 18.78 |
| Ranking position | 18 | 29 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | Apple | MediaTek |
| Architecture | Apple Silicon (Arm) | Armv9-A |
| Release date | Q3 2022 | Q4 2022 |
Specifications
| Apple A16 Bionic | Dimensity 9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Core layout | 2× Apple A16 3.46 GHz + 4× Apple E 2.02 GHz | 1× Cortex-X3 3.05 GHz + 3× Cortex-A715 2.85 GHz + 4× Cortex-A510 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.46 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| Process node | TSMC N4 | TSMC N4P |
| Graphics | Apple GPU (5 cores) | Arm Immortalis-G715 |
Memory
| Apple A16 Bionic | Dimensity 9200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Apple A16 Bionic
- 33% higher overall score
- 35% faster single core
Dimensity 9200
- more cores: 8 vs 6
- more threads: 8 vs 6
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple A16 Bionic / Dimensity 9200.
No comments yet — be the first.