FPSVersusApple A16 Bionic vs Apple A17 Pro
Performance score
By our estimate, Apple A17 Pro beats Apple A16 Bionic by 14%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Apple A16 Bionic | Apple A17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 24.95 | 28.34 |
| Ranking position | 18 | 14 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | Apple | Apple |
| Architecture | Apple Silicon (Arm) | Apple Silicon (Arm) |
| Release date | Q3 2022 | Q3 2023 |
Specifications
| Apple A16 Bionic | Apple A17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Threads | 6 | 6 |
| Core layout | 2× Apple A16 3.46 GHz + 4× Apple E 2.02 GHz | 2× Apple A17 3.78 GHz + 4× Apple E 2.11 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.46 GHz | 3.78 GHz |
| Process node | TSMC N4 | TSMC N3B |
| Graphics | Apple GPU (5 cores) | Apple GPU (6 cores) |
Memory
| Apple A16 Bionic | Apple A17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Pros and cons
Apple A16 Bionic
- no notable advantages
Apple A17 Pro
- 14% higher overall score
- 15% faster single core
- newer: released in 2023
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple A16 Bionic / Apple A17 Pro.
No comments yet — be the first.