FPSVersusApple A14 Bionic vs Apple A16 Bionic
Performance score
Apple A16 Bionic is 23% faster than Apple A14 Bionic by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Apple A14 Bionic | Apple A16 Bionic | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 20.29 | 24.95 |
| Ranking position | 26 | 18 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | Apple | Apple |
| Architecture | Apple Silicon (Arm) | Apple Silicon (Arm) |
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q3 2022 |
Specifications
| Apple A14 Bionic | Apple A16 Bionic | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Threads | 6 | 6 |
| Core layout | 2× Apple A14 3 GHz + 4× Apple E 1.82 GHz | 2× Apple A16 3.46 GHz + 4× Apple E 2.02 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3 GHz | 3.46 GHz |
| Process node | TSMC N5 | TSMC N4 |
| Graphics | Apple GPU (4 cores) | Apple GPU (5 cores) |
Memory
| Apple A14 Bionic | Apple A16 Bionic | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Pros and cons
Apple A14 Bionic
- no notable advantages
Apple A16 Bionic
- 23% higher overall score
- 25% faster single core
- newer: released in 2022
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple A14 Bionic / Apple A16 Bionic.
No comments yet — be the first.