FPSVersusiPhone 16 Pro vs vivo X200 Pro
Performance score
iPhone 16 Pro is 4% faster than vivo X200 Pro by our estimate.
A smartphone's score is the score of its chip — our calculation from specs, not a benchmark. See screen, battery and cameras in the tables below.
Overview
| iPhone 16 Pro | vivo X200 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance (0–100) | 32.64 | 31.44 |
| Chip | Apple A18 Pro | Dimensity 9400 |
| Brand | Apple | vivo |
| Release date | Q3 2024 | Q4 2024 |
| Launch price | $999 | no data |
| OS at launch | iOS 18 | Android 15 |
Display
| iPhone 16 Pro | vivo X200 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.78″ |
| Resolution | 2622×1206 | 2800×1260 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Display type | Super Retina XDR OLED | AMOLED |
Memory
| iPhone 16 Pro | vivo X200 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | no data | 12 / 16 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB / 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB | 256 GB / 512 GB |
Battery, cameras, body
| iPhone 16 Pro | vivo X200 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | no data | 6000 mAh |
| Wired charging | no data | 90 W |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Weight | 199 g | 228 g |
Apple does not publish RAM size, battery capacity or charging power, so these are not listed for iPhones.
Pros and cons
iPhone 16 Pro
- chip is 4% faster
- more storage in the top version: 1 TB vs 512 GB
- more compact: 6.3″ vs 6.78″ screen
- lighter: 199 vs 228 g
vivo X200 Pro
- bigger screen: 6.78″ vs 6.3″
- more main-camera megapixels: 50 vs 48 MP
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: iPhone 16 Pro / vivo X200 Pro.
No comments yet — be the first.