FPSVersusSamsung Galaxy S26 vs vivo X200 Pro
Performance score
By our estimate, Samsung Galaxy S26 beats vivo X200 Pro by 11%.
A smartphone's score is the score of its chip — our calculation from specs, not a benchmark. See screen, battery and cameras in the tables below.
Overview
| Samsung Galaxy S26 | vivo X200 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance (0–100) | 34.81 | 31.44 |
| Chip | Exynos 2600 (in the US, China and Japan — Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) | Dimensity 9400 |
| Brand | Samsung | vivo |
| Release date | Q1 2026 | Q4 2024 |
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
Display
| Samsung Galaxy S26 | vivo X200 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.78″ |
| Resolution | 2340×1080 | 2800×1260 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
Memory
| Samsung Galaxy S26 | vivo X200 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 / 16 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB / 512 GB | 256 GB / 512 GB |
Battery, cameras, body
| Samsung Galaxy S26 | vivo X200 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4300 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Weight | 167 g | 228 g |
Pros and cons
Samsung Galaxy S26
- chip is 11% faster
- more compact: 6.3″ vs 6.78″ screen
- lighter: 167 vs 228 g
- newer: released in 2026
vivo X200 Pro
- bigger battery: 6000 vs 4300 mAh
- faster charging: 90 vs 25 W
- more RAM: up to 16 vs 12 GB
- bigger screen: 6.78″ vs 6.3″
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Samsung Galaxy S26 / vivo X200 Pro.
No comments yet — be the first.