FPSVersusSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs iPhone 17e
Performance score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is 32% faster than iPhone 17e by our estimate.
A smartphone's score is the score of its chip — our calculation from specs, not a benchmark. See screen, battery and cameras in the tables below.
Overview
| Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | iPhone 17e | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance (0–100) | 48.24 | 36.64 |
| Chip | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy | Apple A19 |
| Brand | Samsung | Apple |
| Release date | Q1 2026 | Q1 2026 |
| OS at launch | Android 16 | iOS 26 |
Display
| Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | iPhone 17e | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.1″ |
| Resolution | 3120×1440 | 2532×1170 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Super Retina XDR OLED |
Memory
| Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | iPhone 17e | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 / 16 GB | no data |
| Storage | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB | 256 GB / 512 GB |
Battery, cameras, body
| Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | iPhone 17e | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | no data |
| Wired charging | 60 W | no data |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 1 |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Weight | 214 g | 169 g |
Apple does not publish RAM size, battery capacity or charging power, so these are not listed for iPhones.
Pros and cons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- chip is 32% faster
- smoother screen: 120 vs 60 Hz
- more storage in the top version: 1 TB vs 512 GB
- bigger screen: 6.9″ vs 6.1″
- more main-camera megapixels: 200 vs 48 MP
iPhone 17e
- more compact: 6.1″ vs 6.9″ screen
- lighter: 169 vs 214 g
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra / iPhone 17e.
No comments yet — be the first.