FPSVersusSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs iPhone 16 Pro
Performance score
By our estimate, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra beats iPhone 16 Pro by 22%.
A smartphone's score is the score of its chip — our calculation from specs, not a benchmark. See screen, battery and cameras in the tables below.
Overview
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | iPhone 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance (0–100) | 39.82 | 32.64 |
| Chip | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Apple A18 Pro |
| Brand | Samsung | Apple |
| Release date | Q1 2025 | Q3 2024 |
| Launch price | $1299 | $999 |
| OS at launch | Android 15 | iOS 18 |
Display
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | iPhone 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.3″ |
| Resolution | 3120×1440 | 2622×1206 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Display type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Super Retina XDR OLED |
Memory
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | iPhone 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 12 GB | no data |
| Storage | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB | 128 GB / 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB |
Battery, cameras, body
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | iPhone 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | no data |
| Wired charging | 45 W | no data |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Weight | 218 g | 199 g |
Apple does not publish RAM size, battery capacity or charging power, so these are not listed for iPhones.
Pros and cons
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- chip is 22% faster
- bigger screen: 6.9″ vs 6.3″
- more main-camera megapixels: 200 vs 48 MP
- newer: released in 2025
iPhone 16 Pro
- more compact: 6.3″ vs 6.9″ screen
- lighter: 199 vs 218 g
- cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1299
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra / iPhone 16 Pro.
No comments yet — be the first.