FPSVersusRedmi 13C vs Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Performance score
By our estimate, Samsung Galaxy A25 5G beats Redmi 13C by 80%.
A smartphone's score is the score of its chip — our calculation from specs, not a benchmark. See screen, battery and cameras in the tables below.
Overview
| Redmi 13C | Samsung Galaxy A25 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance (0–100) | 5.21 | 9.4 |
| Chip | Helio G85 (4G version; the 5G version has a different chip) | Exynos 1280 |
| Brand | Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Release date | Q4 2023 | Q4 2023 |
| Launch price | no data | $299 |
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
Display
| Redmi 13C | Samsung Galaxy A25 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.74″ | 6.5″ |
| Resolution | 1600×720 | 2340×1080 |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Display type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Memory
| Redmi 13C | Samsung Galaxy A25 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 4 / 6 / 8 GB | 6 / 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB / 256 GB | 128 GB / 256 GB |
Battery, cameras, body
| Redmi 13C | Samsung Galaxy A25 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 25 W |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Rear cameras | no data | 3 |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Weight | 192 g | 197 g |
Pros and cons
Redmi 13C
- bigger screen: 6.74″ vs 6.5″
- lighter: 192 vs 197 g
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
- chip is 80% faster
- faster charging: 25 vs 18 W
- smoother screen: 120 vs 90 Hz
- more compact: 6.5″ vs 6.74″ screen
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Redmi 13C / Samsung Galaxy A25 5G.
No comments yet — be the first.