FPSVersusRadeon 660M vs Radeon R7 240
Performance score
By our estimate, Radeon 660M beats Radeon R7 240 by 90%.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
GPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Radeon 660M | Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 2.9 | 1.53 |
| Ranking position | 258 | 271 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | no data | 24.45 |
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Type | Integrated | Desktop |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | GCN |
| Release date | no data | 2013-10-08 |
Specifications
| Radeon 660M | Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 384 | 320 |
| Base clock | no data | 730 MHz |
| Boost clock | 1800–1900 MHz | 780 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 1.46 | 0.5 |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
| Upscaling | FSR | no data |
Video memory
| Radeon 660M | Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 / DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Memory bus | no data | 128 bit |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 29 GB/s |
Power and connection
| Radeon 660M | Radeon R7 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| Board power | no data | 30 W |
Pros and cons
Radeon 660M
- 90% higher overall score
- has hardware ray tracing
Radeon R7 240
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Radeon 660M / Radeon R7 240.
No comments yet — be the first.