EN

RTX 2000 Ada Laptop vs RTX A3000 Laptop

VS

Performance score

RTX 2000 Ada Laptop · 8 GB GDDR6, 35–140 W
17.24
RTX A3000 Laptop · 12 GB GDDR6, 60–130 W
18.22 +6%

By our estimate, RTX A3000 Laptop beats RTX 2000 Ada Laptop by 6%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 62% of tested · runs: 24

faster than 47% of tested · runs: 15

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

RTX 2000 Ada LaptopRTX A3000 Laptop
Score (0–100) 17.24 18.22
Ranking position 102 96
Manufacturer NVIDIA NVIDIA
Type Laptop Laptop
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ampere

Specifications

RTX 2000 Ada LaptopRTX A3000 Laptop
Shader cores 3072 4096
Boost clock 2115 MHz 1560 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 12.99 12.78
Hardware ray tracing yes yes

Video memory

RTX 2000 Ada LaptopRTX A3000 Laptop
VRAM 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 192 bit

Power and connection

RTX 2000 Ada LaptopRTX A3000 Laptop
Board power 35–140 W 60–130 W

Pros and cons

RTX 2000 Ada Laptop

  • no notable advantages

RTX A3000 Laptop

  • 6% higher overall score
  • more VRAM: 12 GB vs 8 GB

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 RTX 2000 Ada Laptop:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 RTX A3000 Laptop:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: RTX 2000 Ada Laptop / RTX A3000 Laptop.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.