EN

GeForce GTX 660 vs Radeon R7 370

VS

Performance score

GeForce GTX 660 · 2 GB GDDR5, 140 W
3.88
Radeon R7 370 · 4 GB GDDR5
4.33 +12%

By our estimate, Radeon R7 370 beats GeForce GTX 660 by 12%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 2% of tested · runs: 5

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

GeForce GTX 660Radeon R7 370
Score (0–100) 3.88 4.33
Ranking position 239 234
Power efficiency (0–100) 13.29 no data
Manufacturer NVIDIA AMD
Type Desktop Desktop
Architecture Kepler GCN

Specifications

GeForce GTX 660Radeon R7 370
Shader cores 960 1024
Base clock 980 MHz no data
Boost clock 1033 MHz 975 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 1.98 2
Hardware ray tracing no no

Video memory

GeForce GTX 660Radeon R7 370
VRAM 2 GB 4 GB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory bus 192 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 144 GB/s 179 GB/s

Power and connection

GeForce GTX 660Radeon R7 370
Board power 140 W no data

Pros and cons

GeForce GTX 660

  • no notable advantages

Radeon R7 370

  • 12% higher overall score
  • more VRAM: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • higher memory bandwidth: 179 vs 144 GB/s

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 GeForce GTX 660:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon R7 370:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: GeForce GTX 660 / Radeon R7 370.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.