EN

GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon 660M

VS

Performance score

GeForce GTX 550 Ti · 1 GB GDDR5, 116 W
2.31
Radeon 660M · shared with RAM
2.90 +26%

By our estimate, Radeon 660M beats GeForce GTX 550 Ti by 26%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 12% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

GeForce GTX 550 TiRadeon 660M
Score (0–100) 2.31 2.9
Ranking position 263 258
Power efficiency (0–100) 9.55 no data
Manufacturer NVIDIA AMD
Type Desktop Integrated
Architecture Fermi RDNA 2

Specifications

GeForce GTX 550 TiRadeon 660M
Shader cores 192 384
Base clock 900 MHz no data
Boost clock 1800 MHz 1800–1900 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 0.69 1.46
Hardware ray tracing no yes
Upscaling no data FSR

Video memory

GeForce GTX 550 TiRadeon 660M
VRAM 1 GB shared with RAM
Memory type GDDR5 LPDDR5 / DDR5
Memory bus 192 bit no data
Memory bandwidth 98 GB/s no data

Power and connection

GeForce GTX 550 TiRadeon 660M
Board power 116 W no data

Pros and cons

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

  • no notable advantages

Radeon 660M

  • 26% higher overall score
  • has hardware ray tracing

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 GeForce GTX 550 Ti:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon 660M:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: GeForce GTX 550 Ti / Radeon 660M.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.