EN

GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon 740M

VS

Performance score

GeForce GTX 460 · 1 GB GDDR5, 160 W
2.84
Radeon 740M · shared with RAM
3.18 +12%

Radeon 740M is 12% faster than GeForce GTX 460 by our estimate.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 5% of tested · runs: 5

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

GeForce GTX 460Radeon 740M
Score (0–100) 2.84 3.18
Ranking position 259 254
Power efficiency (0–100) 8.51 no data
Manufacturer NVIDIA AMD
Type Desktop Integrated
Architecture Fermi RDNA 3

Specifications

GeForce GTX 460Radeon 740M
Shader cores 336 256
Base clock 675 MHz no data
Boost clock 1350 MHz 2300–2800 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 0.91 1.43
Hardware ray tracing no yes
Upscaling no data FSR

Video memory

GeForce GTX 460Radeon 740M
VRAM 1 GB shared with RAM
Memory type GDDR5 LPDDR5X / DDR5
Memory bus 256 bit no data
Memory bandwidth 115 GB/s no data

Power and connection

GeForce GTX 460Radeon 740M
Board power 160 W no data

Pros and cons

GeForce GTX 460

  • no notable advantages

Radeon 740M

  • 12% higher overall score
  • has hardware ray tracing

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 GeForce GTX 460:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon 740M:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: GeForce GTX 460 / Radeon 740M.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.