EN

GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon R9 380

VS

Performance score

GeForce GTX 1630 2022 · 4 GB GDDR6, 75 W
6.25
Radeon R9 380 · 4 GB GDDR5
6.56 +5%

By our estimate, Radeon R9 380 beats GeForce GTX 1630 by 5%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 8% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

GeForce GTX 1630Radeon R9 380
Score (0–100) 6.25 6.56
Ranking position 199 195
Power efficiency (0–100) 39.95 no data
Manufacturer NVIDIA AMD
Type Desktop Desktop
Architecture Turing GCN
Release date 2022-06-28 no data

Specifications

GeForce GTX 1630Radeon R9 380
Shader cores 512 1792
Base clock 1740 MHz no data
Boost clock 1785 MHz 970 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 1.83 3.48
Hardware ray tracing no no

Video memory

GeForce GTX 1630Radeon R9 380
VRAM 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory bus 64 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth no data 182 GB/s

Power and connection

GeForce GTX 1630Radeon R9 380
Board power 75 W no data
PCI Express version 3.0 no data

Pros and cons

GeForce GTX 1630

  • no notable advantages

Radeon R9 380

  • 5% higher overall score

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 GeForce GTX 1630:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon R9 380:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: GeForce GTX 1630 / Radeon R9 380.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.