EN

GeForce GTX 1050 vs GeForce GTX 680

VS

Performance score

GeForce GTX 1050 · 2 GB GDDR5, 75 W
5.48
GeForce GTX 680 · 2 GB GDDR5, 195 W
5.62 +3%

GeForce GTX 680 is 3% faster than GeForce GTX 1050 by our estimate.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 4% of tested · runs: 36

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

GeForce GTX 1050GeForce GTX 680
Score (0–100) 5.48 5.62
Ranking position 212 210
Power efficiency (0–100) 35.03 13.82
Manufacturer NVIDIA NVIDIA
Type Desktop Desktop
Architecture Pascal Kepler

Specifications

GeForce GTX 1050GeForce GTX 680
Shader cores 640 1536
Base clock 1354 MHz 1006 MHz
Boost clock 1455 MHz 1058 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 1.86 3.25
Hardware ray tracing no no

Video memory

GeForce GTX 1050GeForce GTX 680
VRAM 2 GB 2 GB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory bus 128 bit 256 bit
Memory bandwidth 112 GB/s 192 GB/s

Power and connection

GeForce GTX 1050GeForce GTX 680
Board power 75 W 195 W

Pros and cons

GeForce GTX 1050

  • lower power draw: 75 W vs 195 W

GeForce GTX 680

  • higher memory bandwidth: 192 vs 112 GB/s

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 GeForce GTX 1050:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 GeForce GTX 680:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: GeForce GTX 1050 / GeForce GTX 680.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.