EN

Arc 130V vs Radeon R9 280X

VS

Performance score

Arc 130V · shared with RAM
7.00
Radeon R9 280X 2013 · 3 GB GDDR5, 250 W
7.42 +6%

Radeon R9 280X is 6% faster than Arc 130V by our estimate.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Arc 130V
576

faster than 33% of tested · runs: 7

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Arc 130VRadeon R9 280X
Score (0–100) 7 7.42
Ranking position 188 184
Power efficiency (0–100) no data 14.23
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Type Integrated Desktop
Architecture Xe2 (Battlemage) GCN
Release date no data 2013-10-08

Specifications

Arc 130VRadeon R9 280X
Shader cores 896 2048
Base clock no data 850 MHz
Boost clock 1850 MHz 1000 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 3.32 4.1
AI TOPS (as stated by the maker) 53 no data
Hardware ray tracing yes no
Upscaling XeSS no data

Video memory

Arc 130VRadeon R9 280X
VRAM shared with RAM 3 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X GDDR5
Memory bus no data 384 bit
Memory bandwidth no data 288 GB/s

Power and connection

Arc 130VRadeon R9 280X
Board power no data 250 W

Pros and cons

Arc 130V

  • has hardware ray tracing

Radeon R9 280X

  • 6% higher overall score

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Arc 130V:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Radeon R9 280X:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc 130V / Radeon R9 280X.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.