FPSVersusArc 130V vs GeForce GTX 780
Performance score
Arc 130V is 4% faster than GeForce GTX 780 by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Arc 130V | GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 7 | 6.76 |
| Ranking position | 188 | 192 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | no data | 12.96 |
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Type | Integrated | Desktop |
| Architecture | Xe2 (Battlemage) | Kepler |
Specifications
| Arc 130V | GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
| Shader cores | 896 | 2304 |
| Base clock | no data | 863 MHz |
| Boost clock | 1850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) | 3.32 | 4.15 |
| AI TOPS (as stated by the maker) | 53 | no data |
| Hardware ray tracing | yes | no |
| Upscaling | XeSS | no data |
Video memory
| Arc 130V | GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | shared with RAM | 3 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus | no data | 384 bit |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 288 GB/s |
Power and connection
| Arc 130V | GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
| Board power | no data | 250 W |
Pros and cons
Arc 130V
- 4% higher overall score
- has hardware ray tracing
GeForce GTX 780
- no notable advantages
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Arc 130V / GeForce GTX 780.
No comments yet — be the first.