EN

Apple M4 GPU 10-core vs Arc 130T

VS

Performance score

Apple M4 GPU 10-core · shared with RAM
5.98 +5%
Arc 130T · shared with RAM
5.70

By our estimate, Apple M4 GPU 10-core beats Arc 130T by 5%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 55% of tested · runs: 176

Arc 130T
661

faster than 38% of tested · runs: 6

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Apple M4 GPU 10-coreArc 130T
Score (0–100) 5.98 5.7
Ranking position 202 208
Manufacturer Apple Intel
Type Integrated Integrated
Architecture Apple Xe (Alchemist)

Specifications

Apple M4 GPU 10-coreArc 130T
Shader cores 1280 896
Boost clock 1578 MHz 2200 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated) 4.04 3.94
Hardware ray tracing yes yes

Video memory

Apple M4 GPU 10-coreArc 130T
VRAM shared with RAM shared with RAM
Memory type unified DDR5 / LPDDR5X

Pros and cons

Apple M4 GPU 10-core

  • 5% higher overall score

Arc 130T

  • no notable advantages

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Apple M4 GPU 10-core:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Arc 130T:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Apple M4 GPU 10-core / Arc 130T.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.