Adreno X2-90 vs Apple M5 Pro GPU 16-core: graphics card comparison

Performance score

Adreno X2-90 · shared with RAM

4.63

Apple M5 Pro GPU 16-core · shared with RAM

8.60 +86%

Radeon Vega 8 Radeon 8060S

By our estimate, Apple M5 Pro GPU 16-core beats Adreno X2-90 by 86%.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (core count, clock, architecture), not FPS from benchmarks. 100 = the fastest card in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

GPU rendering (Blender)

Apple M5 Pro GPU 16-core

3162

faster than 83% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

	Adreno X2-90	Apple M5 Pro GPU 16-core
Score (0–100)	4.63	8.6
Ranking position	227	171
Manufacturer	Qualcomm	Apple
Type	Integrated	Integrated
Architecture	Adreno	Apple

Specifications

	Adreno X2-90	Apple M5 Pro GPU 16-core
Shader cores	1536	2048
Boost clock	1850 MHz	1600 MHz
FP32 TFLOPS (calculated)	5.68	6.55
Hardware ray tracing	yes	yes

Video memory

	Adreno X2-90	Apple M5 Pro GPU 16-core
VRAM	shared with RAM	shared with RAM
Memory type	LPDDR5X	unified

Pros and cons

Adreno X2-90

no notable advantages

Apple M5 Pro GPU 16-core

86% higher overall score

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Adreno X2-90 / Apple M5 Pro GPU 16-core.

No comments yet — be the first.