FPSVersusDimensity 9400+ vs Exynos 2500
Performance score
Dimensity 9400+ is 18% faster than Exynos 2500 by our estimate.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database. A phone without a fan drops its clocks under long load, so in long tasks (hours of gaming, video) it will be slower than the number shows.
Overview
| Dimensity 9400+ | Exynos 2500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 32.13 | 27.3 |
| Ranking position | 12 | 15 |
| Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Manufacturer | MediaTek | Samsung |
| Architecture | Armv9.2-A | Armv9.2-A |
| Release date | Q2 2025 | Q3 2025 |
Specifications
| Dimensity 9400+ | Exynos 2500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10 |
| Threads | 8 | 10 |
| Core layout | 1× Cortex-X925 3.73 GHz + 3× Cortex-X4 3.3 GHz + 4× Cortex-A720 2.4 GHz | 1× Cortex-X925 3.3 GHz + 2× Cortex-A725 2.74 GHz + 5× Cortex-A725 2.36 GHz + 2× Cortex-A520 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.73 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Process node | TSMC N3E | Samsung 3 нм GAA |
| Graphics | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
Memory
| Dimensity 9400+ | Exynos 2500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Pros and cons
Dimensity 9400+
- 18% higher overall score
- 13% faster single core
Exynos 2500
- more cores: 10 vs 8
- more threads: 10 vs 8
Other comparisons
Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Dimensity 9400+ / Exynos 2500.
No comments yet — be the first.