FPSVersusCore i9-13900H vs Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Performance score
Core i9-13900H and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
CPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core i9-13900H | Ryzen AI Max+ 388 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 45.91 | 47 |
| Ranking position | 93 | 90 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 5 (Strix Halo) |
| Release date | Q2 2023 | Q2 2026 |
Specifications
| Core i9-13900H | Ryzen AI Max+ 388 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 14 | 8 |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| P + E cores | 6 + 8 | no data |
| Base clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 32 MB |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | no | AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Pros and cons
Core i9-13900H
- more cores: 14 vs 8
- more threads: 20 vs 16
Ryzen AI Max+ 388
- 8% faster single core
- bigger L3 cache: 32 MB vs 24 MB
- newer: released in 2026
- has integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics)
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core i9-13900H / Ryzen AI Max+ 388.
No comments yet — be the first.