EN

Core i7-1370P vs Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465

VS

Performance score

Core i7-1370P 2023 · 14/20 cores/threads
42.20
Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 2026 · 10/20 cores/threads
42.64

Core i7-1370P and Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

CPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 38% of tested · runs: 1

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Core i7-1370PRyzen AI 9 PRO 465
Score (0–100) 42.2 42.64
Ranking position 123 120
Type Laptop Laptop
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Architecture Raptor Lake Zen 5 (Gorgon Point)
Release date Q1 2023 Q1 2026

Specifications

Core i7-1370PRyzen AI 9 PRO 465
Cores 14 10
Threads 20 20
P + E cores 6 + 8 no data
Base clock 1.9 GHz 2 GHz
Boost clock 5.2 GHz 5 GHz
L3 cache 24 MB 24 MB
Unlocked multiplier no no
Integrated graphics Intel Iris Xe Graphics Radeon 880M
NPU (AI accelerator) no no

Pros and cons

Core i7-1370P

  • more cores: 14 vs 10

Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465

  • newer: released in 2026

Other comparisons

Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core i7-1370P:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core i7-1370P / Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.