EN

Core i7-13705H vs Ryzen 9 7940H

VS

Performance score

Core i7-13705H 2023 · 14/20 cores/threads
42.49
Ryzen 9 7940H 2023 · 8/16 cores/threads
42.68

Core i7-13705H and Ryzen 9 7940H are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

CPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 74% of tested · runs: 2

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Core i7-13705HRyzen 9 7940H
Score (0–100) 42.49 42.68
Ranking position 121 113
Type Laptop Laptop
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Architecture Raptor Lake Zen 4 (Phoenix)
Release date Q1 2023 Q2 2023

Specifications

Core i7-13705HRyzen 9 7940H
Cores 14 8
Threads 20 16
P + E cores 6 + 8 no data
Base clock 2.4 GHz 4 GHz
Boost clock 5 GHz 5.2 GHz
L3 cache 24 MB 16 MB
Unlocked multiplier no no
Integrated graphics Intel Iris Xe Graphics Radeon 780M
NPU (AI accelerator) no no

Pros and cons

Core i7-13705H

  • more cores: 14 vs 8
  • more threads: 20 vs 16
  • bigger L3 cache: 24 MB vs 16 MB

Ryzen 9 7940H

  • 4% faster single core

Other comparisons

Preliminary data: specs are still being checked against the manufacturer's website.

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core i7-13705H:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Ryzen 9 7940H:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core i7-13705H / Ryzen 9 7940H.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.