EN

Core i5-12500H vs Ryzen 5 PRO 215

VS

Performance score

Core i5-12500H 2022 · 12/16 cores/threads
32.39
Ryzen 5 PRO 215 2025 · 6/12 cores/threads
32.30

Core i5-12500H and Ryzen 5 PRO 215 are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.

The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.

Real tests

What the test measures

Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.

CPU rendering (Blender)

faster than 46% of tested · runs: 71

Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.

Overview

Core i5-12500HRyzen 5 PRO 215
Score (0–100) 32.39 32.3
Ranking position 273 274
Type Laptop Laptop
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Architecture Alder Lake Zen 4 (Hawk Point)
Release date Q1 2022 Q1 2025

Specifications

Core i5-12500HRyzen 5 PRO 215
Cores 12 6
Threads 16 12
P + E cores 4 + 8 no data
Base clock 2.5 GHz 3.2 GHz
Boost clock 4.5 GHz 4.7 GHz
L2 cache no data 6 MB
L3 cache 18 MB 16 MB
Unlocked multiplier no no
Integrated graphics Intel Iris Xe Graphics AMD Radeon 740M Graphics
NPU (AI accelerator) no no

Pros and cons

Core i5-12500H

  • more cores: 12 vs 6
  • more threads: 16 vs 12
  • bigger L3 cache: 18 MB vs 16 MB

Ryzen 5 PRO 215

  • 7% faster single core
  • newer: released in 2025

Other comparisons

Visitor rating

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Core i5-12500H:

— Votes: 0

Rate from 1 to 5 Ryzen 5 PRO 215:

Questions and comments

Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core i5-12500H / Ryzen 5 PRO 215.

Links are not allowed in comments.

No comments yet — be the first.