Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Ryzen 9 5950X
Performance score
Core Ultra 9 275HX is 4% faster than Ryzen 9 5950X by our estimate.
Different sockets (FCBGA2114 and AM4) — switching between them needs a different motherboard.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 5950X | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 68.09 | 65.39 |
| Ranking position | 20 | 25 |
| Price/performance (0–100) | no data | 29.37 |
| Power efficiency (0–100) | 64.7 | 32.55 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake | Zen 3 (Vermeer) |
| Release date | Q1 2025 | 2020-11-05 |
| Launch price | no data | $799 |
Specifications
| Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 5950X | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 24 | 16 |
| Threads | 24 | 32 |
| P + E cores | 8 + 16 | no data |
| Base clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L2 cache | 40 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 36 MB | 64 MB |
| Process node | TSMC N3B | 7 nm |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | yes |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Graphics | no |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | 13 TOPS | no |
Compatibility
| Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 5950X | |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | AM4 |
| TDP | 55 W | 105 W |
| Max temperature | 105 °C | 90 °C |
Memory and PCI Express
| Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 5950X | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | DDR5-6400 | DDR4-3200 |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max memory | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| PCI Express version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe lanes | 24 | 20 |
Pros and cons
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- 4% higher overall score
- 30% faster single core
- more cores: 24 vs 16
- lower TDP: 55 W vs 105 W
- newer: released in 2025
- has integrated graphics (Intel Graphics)
Ryzen 9 5950X
- more threads: 32 vs 24
- bigger L3 cache: 64 MB vs 36 MB
- unlocked multiplier (can be overclocked)
Other comparisons
- Core Ultra 9275HX vs Core i913980HX
- Core Ultra 9275HX vs Snapdragon X2 EliteX2E-88-100
- Core Ultra 9275HX vs Apple M5Max 18-core
- Core Ultra 9275HX vs Apple M5Pro 18-core
- Ryzen 95950X vs Apple M5Max 18-core
- Ryzen 95950X vs Apple M5Pro 18-core
- Ryzen 95950X vs Core i914900HX
- Ryzen 95950X vs Snapdragon X2 EliteX2E-88-100
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core Ultra 9 275HX / Ryzen 9 5950X.
No comments yet — be the first.