FPSVersusCore Ultra 7 164U vs Ryzen 7 7435HS
Performance score
Core Ultra 7 164U and Ryzen 7 7435HS are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
CPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core Ultra 7 164U | Ryzen 7 7435HS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 32.93 | 32.71 |
| Ranking position | 261 | 267 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake | Zen 3+ (Rembrandt R) |
| Release date | Q2 2024 | Q1 2024 |
Specifications
| Core Ultra 7 164U | Ryzen 7 7435HS | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 12 | 8 |
| Threads | 14 | 16 |
| P + E cores | 2 + 10 | no data |
| Base clock | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Graphics | no |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Pros and cons
Core Ultra 7 164U
- 16% faster single core
- more cores: 12 vs 8
- has integrated graphics (Intel Graphics)
Ryzen 7 7435HS
- more threads: 16 vs 14
- bigger L3 cache: 16 MB vs 12 MB
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core Ultra 7 164U / Ryzen 7 7435HS.
No comments yet — be the first.