FPSVersusCore 5 320 vs Ryzen 5 6600H
Performance score
Core 5 320 and Ryzen 5 6600H are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
CPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core 5 320 | Ryzen 5 6600H | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 28.36 | 28.54 |
| Ranking position | 329 | 324 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Wildcat Lake | Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) |
| Release date | Q2 2026 | Q1 2022 |
Specifications
| Core 5 320 | Ryzen 5 6600H | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Threads | 6 | 12 |
| P + E cores | 2 + 4 | no data |
| Base clock | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 16 MB |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Graphics | AMD Radeon 660M Graphics |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Pros and cons
Core 5 320
- 21% faster single core
- newer: released in 2026
Ryzen 5 6600H
- more threads: 12 vs 6
- bigger L3 cache: 16 MB vs 6 MB
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core 5 320 / Ryzen 5 6600H.
No comments yet — be the first.