FPSVersusCore 5 210H vs Ryzen 5 PRO 216
Performance score
Core 5 210H and Ryzen 5 PRO 216 are almost equally fast (under 3% apart) — choose by price, socket and platform.
The score is our own estimate from the specs (cores, threads, clocks, architecture generation), not a benchmark run. 100 = the fastest CPU in our database.
Real tests
What the test measures
Blender is a popular free 3D graphics program. The test makes the device render three ready-made 3D scenes (light, shadows, reflections) and counts how many render passes it finishes per minute. The higher the number, the faster the device handles heavy work: 3D, video editing, photo processing. On a CPU the test loads all cores at once, so it shows the chip's full power; on a graphics card it shows its compute strength.
CPU rendering (Blender)
Median of real test runs on users' computers. It does not show FPS in games. Data updated: 31.10.2026.
Overview
| Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 PRO 216 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score (0–100) | 31.07 | 31.71 |
| Ranking position | 294 | 287 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 4 (Hawk Point) |
| Release date | Q4 2024 | Q4 2026 |
Specifications
| Core 5 210H | Ryzen 5 PRO 216 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| P + E cores | 4 + 4 | no data |
| Base clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB |
| Unlocked multiplier | no | no |
| Integrated graphics | Intel Graphics | AMD Radeon 740M Graphics |
| NPU (AI accelerator) | no | no |
Pros and cons
Core 5 210H
- more cores: 8 vs 6
Ryzen 5 PRO 216
- bigger L3 cache: 16 MB vs 12 MB
- newer: released in 2026
Other comparisons
Visitor rating
Questions and comments
Share your experience, ask a question or tell us about a mistake on this page: Core 5 210H / Ryzen 5 PRO 216.
No comments yet — be the first.